AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11055/209
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWatson, M J-
dc.contributor.authorWong, DM-
dc.contributor.authorKluger, R-
dc.contributor.authorChuan, A-
dc.contributor.authorHerrick, M D-
dc.contributor.authorNg, I-
dc.contributor.authorCatanelli, DJ-
dc.contributor.authorLin, L-
dc.contributor.authorLansdown, AK-
dc.contributor.authorBarrington, MJ-
dc.date2014-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-08T00:49:02Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-08T00:49:02Z-
dc.date.issued2014-06-
dc.identifier.citationAnaesthesia 2014-06; 69(6): 604-12-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11055/209-
dc.description.abstractAssessment tools must be investigated for reliability, validity and feasibility before being implemented. In 2013, the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists introduced workplace-based assessments, including a direct observation of a procedural skills assessment tool. The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of this assessment tool for ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia. Six experts assessed 30 video-recorded trainee performances of ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia. Inter-rater reliability, assessed using absolute agreement intraclass correlation coefficients, varied from 0.10 to 0.49 for the nine individual nine-point scale items, and was 0.25 for a 'total score' of all items. Internal consistency was measured by correlation between 'total score' and 'overall performance' scale item (r = 0.68, p < 0.001). Construct validity was demonstrated by the 'total score' correlating with trainee experience (r = 0.51, p = 0.004). The mean time taken to complete assessments was 6 min 35 s.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subject.meshAged-
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and over-
dc.subject.meshPsychometrics-
dc.subject.meshAnesthesia, Conduction-
dc.subject.meshClinical Competence-
dc.subject.meshUltrasonography, Interventional-
dc.titlePsychometric evaluation of a direct observation of procedural skills assessment tool for ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't-
dc.identifier.journaltitleAnaesthesia-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/anae.12625-
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24749931-
dc.identifier.pubmedid24749931-
dc.ispartof.anzcaresearchfoundationYes-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairetypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.