AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11055/1111
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrazenor, Graeme Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorMalham, Gregory Men_US
dc.contributor.authorTeddy, Peter Jen_US
dc.date2021-10-29-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-30T00:41:07Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-30T00:41:07Z-
dc.identifier.citation2021 Oct 29;pnab319 Online ahead of print.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1526-4637en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11055/1111-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To conduct a comprehensive search for evidence whether Central Sensitization following an injury can act as a persistent autonomous pain generator after the inducing injury has healed. Methods: We searched Medline on PubMed and the Cochrane Library, screening 3,572 abstracts, from which 937 full text articles were obtained, with 186 of these discarded as irrelevant to the question being posed. The remaining 751 articles were studied for evidence. Results: Fourteen publications were judged to provide weak evidence for the hypothesis of central sensitization as a persisting autonomous pain generator, but none addressed the question directly. No strong evidence for the affirmative answer was found. Sixty-two publications were judged to provide weak evidence for a negative answer, and nine judged to provide strong evidence. Unexpectedly, serious weaknesses were discovered in the literature underpinning the validity of the clinical diagnosis of Central Sensitization in man:(i) Inappropriate extrapolation, in many publications, of laboratory animal data to humans.(ii) Failure to demonstrate the absence of peripheral pain generators which might be perpetuating Central Sensitization.(iii) Many factors now shown to confound what is being measured by quantitative sensory testing, conditioned pain modulation, and Central Sensitization Inventory. Conclusions: We found no evidence proving that central sensitization can persist as an autonomous pain generator after the initiating injury has healed. Our review has also shown that the evidential basis for the diagnosis of CS in individual patients is seriously in question.en_US
dc.subjectCentral sensitizationen_US
dc.subjectcentral sensitization diagnosisen_US
dc.subjectchronic painen_US
dc.titleCan Central Sensitization after injury persist as an autonomous pain generator? - A comprehensive search for evidenceen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.journaltitlePain Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/pm/pnab319en_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34718773/en_US
dc.type.studyortrialCase Control Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.anzcaTeddy, PJen_US
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.