AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11055/876
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSmith Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorFaux SGen_US
dc.contributor.authorGardner Ten_US
dc.contributor.authorHobbs MJen_US
dc.contributor.authorJames MAen_US
dc.contributor.authorJoubert AEen_US
dc.contributor.authorKladnitski Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorNewby JMen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchultz Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorShiner CTen_US
dc.contributor.authorAndrews Gen_US
dc.date2019-09-09-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-11T00:53:15Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-11T00:53:15Z-
dc.identifier.citationSep 9. pii: pnz20; [Epub ahead of print]en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11055/876-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Chronic pain is a prevalent and burdensome condition. Reboot Online was developed to address treatment barriers traditionally associated with accessing face-to-face chronic pain management programs. It is a comprehensive multidisciplinary online treatment program, based on an existing and effective face-to-face multidisciplinary pain program (the Reboot program). DESIGN & PARTICIPANTS: A CONSORT-compliant randomized controlled trial was conducted, enrolling adults who had experienced pain for three months or longer. METHODS: Participants were randomly allocated to either an eight-lesson multidisciplinary pain management program, Reboot Online (N = 41), or to a usual care (UC) control group (N = 39). Clinical oversight was provided by a multidisciplinary team remotely, including physiotherapists and clinical psychologists. Participants were measured at baseline, post-treatment (week 16), and three-month follow-up (week 28). RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analyses revealed that Reboot Online was significantly more effective than UC at increasing pain self-efficacy (g = 0.69) at post-treatment, and these gains were maintained at follow-up. Similarly, Reboot Online was significantly more effective than UC on several secondary measures at post-treatment and follow-up, including movement-based fear avoidance and pain-related disability, but it did not significantly reduce pain interference or depression compared with UC. Clinician input was minimal, and adherence to Reboot Online was moderate, with 61% of participants (N = 25) completing all eight lessons. CONCLUSIONS: Reboot Online presents a novel approach to multidisciplinary pain management and offers an accessible, efficacious alternative and viable treatment option for chronic pain management.en_US
dc.subjectChronic Painen_US
dc.subjectinterneten_US
dc.subjectPain Managementen_US
dc.subjectonline treatmenten_US
dc.subjecttelehealthen_US
dc.titleReboot Online: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing an Online Multidisciplinary Pain Management Program with Usual Care for Chronic Pain.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.journaltitlePain Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/pm/pnz208en_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=31498393en_US
dc.type.studyortrialCase Control Studiesen_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.