AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11055/813
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTardif Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorArnold Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorHayes Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorEagar Ken_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-14T02:05:23Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-14T02:05:23Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citation18(6):1007-1018en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11055/813-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Chronic pain is experienced by one in five Australians and is estimated to be the nation's third most costly health problem. In 2013, a chronic pain treatment outcomes registry was established, with the goals of evaluating treatment of chronic pain in multidisciplinary centers, establishing a benchmarking system to drive quality improvement and providing answers to important questions regarding types of treatment ("dose," intensity, and response) and which treatment is appropriate for different patients. This paper describes the development and the first-phase implementation of the registry. METHODS: A minimum data set of primarily patient-rated measures was developed for use within pain management services. Governance structures and protocols for data collection were established, and software and resources created, to support pain management services. RESULTS: Data collection commenced in 21 centers in Australia and is being implemented in over 20 others across Australia and New Zealand within the first two years. Feedback in the initial phase has already resulted in improvements to the software and reports, as well as minor changes to the data set. Centers have submitted high-quality data describing the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients referred to specialist pain services. CONCLUSIONS: The electronic Persistent Pain Outcomes Collaboration has been established for Australasia and is strongly supported by specialist societies and consumer groups. The next phase will increase the proportion of follow-up data in order to realize the registry's goals of evaluation, benchmarking, and research to improve outcomes and services for patients experiencing persistent pain.en_US
dc.subjectBenchmarkingen_US
dc.subjectChronic Painen_US
dc.subjectPain Managementen_US
dc.subjectQuality Improvementen_US
dc.titleEstablishment of the Australasian Electronic Persistent Pain Outcomes Collaboration.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.journaltitlePain Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/pm/pnw201en_US
dc.type.studyortrialStudyen_US
local.message.claim2023-05-01T22:25:08.523+1000|||rp00071|||submit_approve|||dc_contributor_author|||None*
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

42
checked on Sep 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.