AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Sophie S-
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Paul A-
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Stephanie-
dc.identifier.citationAnesthesia and analgesia 2013-08; 117(2): 373-9-
dc.description.abstractResidual neuromuscular block is defined as a mechanomyography (MMG) or electromyography (EMG) train-of-four (TOF) ratio <0.90, and is common in patients receiving neuromuscular blocking drugs. Objective neuromuscular monitoring is the only reliable way to detect and exclude residual neuromuscular block. Acceleromyography (AMG) is commercially available and easy to use in the clinical setting. However, AMG is not interchangeable with MMG or EMG. Currently, it is unclear what value must be reached by AMG TOF ratio to reliably exclude residual neuromuscular block. During spontaneous recovery from neuromuscular block, we monitored TOF ratio on the same arm using AMG at the adductor pollicis and EMG at the first dorsal interosseus. AMG and EMG TOF ratios were compared by the Bland-Altman analysis for repeated measurements. The precision of each device was assessed by the repeatability coefficient. A small repeatability coefficient indicates high precision of the device. The agreement between the devices was assessed by the bias and the 95% limits of agreement. Small bias and narrow limits of agreement indicate strong agreement. We defined clinically acceptable agreement between AMG and EMG as a bias <0.025 and limits of agreement within -0.050 to 0.050, provided that the control comparison between EMG and itself can fulfill these criteria. In 26 patients, 261 comparisons between AMG and EMG were made. The repeatability coefficient of AMG and EMG were 0.094 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.088-0.100) and 0.051 (95% CI, 0.048-0.055), respectively. The bias between AMG and EMG TOF ratio was 0.176 (95% CI, 0.162-0.190), with limits of agreement -0.045 to 0.396 (95% CI, -0.067 to 0.419). AMG is less precise than EMG and overestimates EMG TOF ratio by at least 0.15. The lack of agreement cannot be attributed to instrumental imprecision or the baseline difference between successive measurements during spontaneous recovery of neuromuscular function. Residual neuromuscular block cannot be excluded on reaching an AMG TOF ratio of 1.00.-
dc.subject.meshAnalysis of Variance-
dc.subject.meshAnesthesia Recovery Period-
dc.subject.meshEquipment Design-
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.meshNeuromuscular Blockade-
dc.subject.meshNeuromuscular Junction-
dc.subject.meshNeuromuscular Monitoring-
dc.subject.meshNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents-
dc.subject.meshPredictive Value of Tests-
dc.subject.meshReproducibility of Results-
dc.subject.meshAnesthesia, General-
dc.titleAn ipsilateral comparison of acceleromyography and electromyography during recovery from nondepolarizing neuromuscular block under general anesthesia in humans.-
dc.typeComparative Study-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't-
dc.identifier.journaltitleAnesthesia and analgesia-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeComparative Study-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairetypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't-
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.