AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11055/481
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGarden, AL-
dc.contributor.authorLe Fevre, D M-
dc.contributor.authorWaddington, H L-
dc.contributor.authorWeller, JM-
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-12T00:31:39Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-12T00:31:39Z-
dc.date.issued2015-05-
dc.identifier.citationAnaesthesia and intensive care 2015-05; 43(3): 300-8-
dc.identifier.issn0310-057X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11055/481-
dc.description.abstractNon-technical skills training in healthcare frequently uses high-fidelity simulation followed by a facilitated discussion known as debriefing. This type of training is mandatory for anaesthesia training in Australia and New Zealand. Debriefing by a skilled facilitator is thought to be essential for new learning through feedback and reflective processes. Key elements of effective debriefing need to be clearly identified to ensure that the training is evidence-based. We undertook a systematic review of empirical studies where elements of debriefing have been systematically manipulated during non-technical skills training. Eight publications met the inclusion criteria, but seven of these were of limited generalisability. The only study that was generalisable found that debriefing by novice instructors using a script improved team leader performance in paediatric resuscitation. The remaining seven publications were limited by the small number of debriefers included in each study and these reports were thus analogous to case reports. Generally, performance improved after debriefing by a skilled facilitator. However, the debriefer provided no specific advantage over other post-experience educational interventions. Acknowledging their limitations, these studies found that performance improved after self-led debrief, no debrief (with experienced practitioners), standardised multimedia debrief or after reviewing a DVD of the participants' own eye-tracking. There was no added performance improvement when review of a video recording was added to facilitator-led debriefing. One study reported no performance improvement after debriefing. Without empirical evidence that is specific to the healthcare domain, theories of learning from education and psychology should continue to inform practices and teaching for effective debriefing.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subject.meshAnesthesiology-
dc.subject.meshAustralia-
dc.subject.meshNew Zealand-
dc.subject.meshTeaching-
dc.subject.meshVideo Recording-
dc.subject.meshClinical Competence-
dc.subject.meshLearning-
dc.subject.meshManikins-
dc.titleDebriefing after simulation-based non-technical skill training in healthcare: a systematic review of effective practice.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't-
dc.typeReview-
dc.identifier.journaltitleAnaesthesia and intensive care-
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25943601-
dc.identifier.pubmedid25943601-
dc.ispartof.anzcaresearchfoundationYes-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairetypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't-
item.openairetypeReview-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

34
checked on Mar 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.