AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11055/199
Title: Safety, feasibility, and effect of remote ischemic conditioning in patients undergoing lung transplantation.
Authors: Lin, E 
Snell, Gregory I
Levvey, Bronwyn J
Mifsud, Nicole
Paul, Moumita
Buckland, MR 
Gooi, Julian
Marasco, Silvana
Sharland, Alexandra F
Myles, PS 
Issue Date: Nov-2014
Source: The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation 2014-11; 33(11): 1139-48
Abstract: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains a significant problem after lung transplantation. Data from animal and clinical studies suggest that remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) may reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury in solid organ transplantation. A pilot randomized controlled trial of 60 patients undergoing bilateral sequential lung transplantation assessed the utility of RIC in attenuating PGD. Treated recipients underwent 3 cycles of lower limb ischemic conditioning before allograft reperfusion. The primary outcome measure was a comparison of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (P/F ratio) between treatment groups. No adverse effects of tourniquet application were observed. The mean lowest P/F ratio during the first 24 hours after transplantation was 271.3 mm Hg in the treatment arm vs 256.1 mm Hg in the control arm (p = 0.46). PGD grade and severity and the rate of acute rejection also showed a tendency to favor the treatment arm. Sub-group analysis demonstrated a significant benefit of treatment in patients with a primary diagnosis of restrictive lung disease, a group at high risk for the development of PGD. RIC was not accompanied by systemic release of high-molecular-weight group box 1. Levels of cytokines, high-molecular-weight group box 1, and endogenous secretory receptor for advanced glycation end products peaked within 2 hours after reperfusion and likely reflected donor organ quality rather than an effect of RIC. RIC did not significantly improve P/F ratios or PGD in this randomized controlled trial. However, encouraging results in this small study warrant a large multicenter trial of RIC in lung transplantation.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11055/199
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical

Show full item record

Page view(s)

32
checked on Aug 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.