AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11055/1284
Title: An implantable restorative-neurostimulator for refractory mechanical chronic low back pain: a randomized sham-controlled clinical trial
Authors: Gilligan C
Volschenk W
Russo M 
Green M
Gilmore C
Mehta V
Deckers K
De Smedt K
Latif U
Georgius P 
Gentile J
Mitchell B
Langhorst M
Huygen F
Baranidharan G
Patel V
Mironer E
Ross E
Carayannopoulos A
Hayek S
Gulve A
Van Buyten JP
Tohmeh A
Fischgrund J
Lad S
Ahadian F
Deer T
Klemme W
Rauck R
Rathmell J
Levy R
Heemels JP
Eldabe S
Issue Date: 1-Oct-2021
Source: 162(10):2486-2498.
Abstract: Chronic low back pain can be caused by impaired control and degeneration of the multifidus muscles and consequent functional instability of the lumbar spine. Available treatment options have limited effectiveness and prognosis is unfavorable. We conducted an international randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial at 26 multidisciplinary centers to determine safety and efficacy of an implantable, restorative neurostimulator designed to restore multifidus neuromuscular control and facilitate relief of symptoms (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02577354). Two hundred four eligible participants with refractory mechanical (musculoskeletal) chronic LBP and a positive prone instability test indicating impaired multifidus control were implanted and randomized to therapeutic (N = 102) or low-level sham (N = 102) stimulation of the medial branch of the dorsal ramus nerve (multifidus nerve supply) for 30 minutes twice daily. The primary endpoint was the comparison of responder proportions (≥30% relief on the LBP visual analogue scale without analgesics increase) at 120 days. After the primary endpoint assessment, participants in the sham-control group switched to therapeutic stimulation and the combined cohort was assessed through 1 year for long-term outcomes and adverse events. The primary endpoint was inconclusive in terms of treatment superiority (57.1% vs 46.6%; difference: 10.4%; 95% confidence interval, -3.3% to 24.1%, P = 0.138). Prespecified secondary outcomes and analyses were consistent with a modest but clinically meaningful treatment benefit at 120 days. Improvements from baseline, which continued to accrue in all outcome measures after conclusion of the double-blind phase, were clinically important at 1 year. The incidence of serious procedure- or device-related adverse events (3.9%) compared favorably with other neuromodulation therapies for chronic pain.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11055/1284
ISSN: 0304-3959
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ReActiv8-B - An implantable restorative neurostimulator for CLBP.pdf
  Restricted Access
721.15 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Page view(s)

20
checked on Jan 21, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.