Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11055/1262
Title: | Holistic Treatment Response: An International Expert Panel Definition and Criteria for a New Paradigm in the Assessment of Clinical Outcomes of Spinal Cord Stimulation | Authors: | Levy RM Mekhail N Abd-Elsayed A Abejón D Anitescu M Deer TR Eldabe S Goudman L Kallewaard JW Moens M Petersen EA Pilitsis JG Pope JE Poree L Raslan AM Russo M Sayed D Staats PS Taylor RS Thomson S Verrills P Duarte RV |
Keywords: | Chronic pain holistic treatment response minimal clinical important difference physiologic confirmation of therapy spinal cord stimulation |
Issue Date: | Jul-2023 | Source: | 26(5):1015-1022. | Abstract: | Background: Treatment response to spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is focused on the magnitude of effects on pain intensity. However, chronic pain is a multidimensional condition that may affect individuals in different ways and as such it seems reductionist to evaluate treatment response based solely on a unidimensional measure such as pain intensity. Aim: The aim of this article is to add to a framework started by IMMPACT for assessing the wider health impact of treatment with SCS for people with chronic pain, a "holistic treatment response". Discussion: Several aspects need consideration in the assessment of a holistic treatment response. SCS device data and how it relates to patient outcomes, is essential to improve the understanding of the different types of SCS, improve patient selection, long-term clinical outcomes, and reproducibility of findings. The outcomes to include in the evaluation of a holistic treatment response need to consider clinical relevance for patients and clinicians. Assessment of the holistic response combines two key concepts of patient assessment: (1) patients level of baseline (pre-treatment) unmet need across a range of health domains; (2) demonstration of patient-relevant improvements in these health domains with treatment. The minimal clinical important difference (MCID) is an established approach to reflect changes after a clinical intervention that are meaningful for the patient and can be used to identify treatment response to each individual domain. A holistic treatment response needs to account for MCIDs in all domains of importance for which the patient presents dysfunctional scores pre-treatment. The number of domains included in a holistic treatment response may vary and should be considered on an individual basis. Physiologic confirmation of therapy delivery and utilisation should be included as part of the evaluation of a holistic treatment response and is essential to advance the field of SCS and increase transparency and reproducibility of the findings. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11055/1262 | ISSN: | 1094-7159 |
Appears in Collections: | Scholarly and Clinical |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Holistic Treatment Response - An International Expert Panel Definition and Criteria for a New Paradigm in the Assessment of Clinical Outcomes of SCS - 2023.pdf Restricted Access | 413.98 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.