AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11055/1261
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRusso Men_US
dc.contributor.authorGraham Ben_US
dc.contributor.authorSantarelli DMen_US
dc.date2022-10-27-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-10T03:50:55Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-10T03:50:55Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-
dc.identifier.citation23(1):63-69.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1530-7085en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11055/1261-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Gabapentin is a recommended first-line agent for treating neuropathic pain; however, its efficacy rate is reportedly low, and the risk of adverse events is high. A plausible explanation for this lies with its wide range of actions, the entirety of which have yet to be fully elucidated. Methods: A review of the literature was conducted on gabapentin's known and proposed analgesic mechanisms of action, as well as potentially opposing or detrimental actions. Results: Gabapentin's classical analgesic mechanisms involve direct attenuation of excitatory neurotransmission in the spinal cord via inhibition of neuronal ion channels, while indirect mechanisms include descending inhibition and block of injury-evoked synaptogenesis. Glial effects have also been reported; however, whether they are neuroprotective or detrimental is unknown. Furthermore, data from animal models do not reflect clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Gabapentin's clinical use should be reconsidered according to the net effects of its numerous assumed actions, including the tripartite synapse and oligodendrocyte effects. Whether it is doing more harm than good, especially in the scenarios of incomplete or loss of response, warrants consideration when prescribing gabapentin.en_US
dc.subjectanalgesiaen_US
dc.subjectgabapentinen_US
dc.subjectglial cellsen_US
dc.subjectneuropathic painen_US
dc.subjectpharmacologic actionsen_US
dc.titleGabapentin – Friend or foe?en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.journaltitlePain Practice: The Official Journal of World Institute of Pain.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/papr.13165en_US
dc.description.affiliatesHunter Pain Specialists, Broadmeadow, New South Wales, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesGenesis Research Services, Broadmeadow, New South Wales, Australia.en_US
dc.description.affiliatesSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.en_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36300903/en_US
dc.type.studyortrialReviewsen_US
dc.type.specialtyAnaesthesiaen_US
dc.type.specialtyPain Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.fulltextlinkhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/papr.13165en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Pain Practice - 2022 - Russo - Gabapentin Friend or foe.pdf
  Restricted Access
147.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

124
checked on Mar 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.