AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11055/1208
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDeer TRen_US
dc.contributor.authorHayek SMen_US
dc.contributor.authorPope JEen_US
dc.contributor.authorLamer TJen_US
dc.contributor.authorHamza Men_US
dc.contributor.authorGrider SJen_US
dc.contributor.authorRosen SMen_US
dc.contributor.authorNarouze Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorPerruchoid Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorThomson Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorRusso Men_US
dc.contributor.authorGrigsby Een_US
dc.contributor.authorDoleys DMen_US
dc.contributor.authorJacobs MSen_US
dc.contributor.authorSaulino Men_US
dc.contributor.authorChristo Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorKim Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuntoon EMen_US
dc.contributor.authorKrames Een_US
dc.contributor.authorMekhail Nen_US
dc.date2017-01-02-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-02T05:05:53Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-02T05:05:53Z-
dc.date.issued2017-02-
dc.identifier.citation20(2):133-154.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1094-7159en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11055/1208-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Intrathecal (IT) drug infusion is an appropriate and necessary tool in the algorithm to treat refractory cancer and noncancer pain. The decision-making steps/methodology for selecting appropriate patients for implanted targeted drug delivery systems is controversial and complicated. Therefore, a consensus on best practices for determining appropriate use of IT drug infusion may involve testing/trialing this therapy before implantation. Methods: This current Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC) update was designed to address the deficiencies and emerging innovations since the previous PACC convened in 2012. A literature search identified publications available since the previous PACC publications in 2014, and relevant sources were contributed by the PACC members. After reviewing the literature, the panel determined the evidence levels and degrees of recommendations. The developed consensus was ranked as strong (>80%), moderate (50-79%), or weak (<49%). Results: The trialing for IT drug delivery systems (IDDS) remains an area of continued controversy. The PACC recommendations for trialing are presented in 34 consensus points and cover trialing for morphine, ziconotide, and medication admixtures; starting doses and titration practices; measurements of success; trial settings and monitoring; management of systemic opioids during trialing; and the role of psychological evaluation. Finally, the PACC describes clinical scenarios in which IT trialing is required or not required. Conclusion: The PACC provides consensus guidance on best practices of trialing for IDDS implants. In addition, the PACC recommends that no trial may be required in certain patient populations.en_US
dc.subjectcanceren_US
dc.subjectguidelinesen_US
dc.subjectintrathecal drug infusionen_US
dc.subjectnoncanceren_US
dc.subjectpainen_US
dc.subjectreviewen_US
dc.subjecttrialingen_US
dc.titleThe Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC): Recommendations for Trialling of Intrathecal Drug Delivery Infusion Therapy.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleNeuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interfaceen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ner.12543en_US
dc.description.affiliatesCenter for Pain Relief, Charleston, WV, USAen_US
dc.description.affiliatesHospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USAen_US
dc.description.affiliatesSummit Pain Alliance, Santa Rosa, CA, USAen_US
dc.description.affiliatesMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USAen_US
dc.description.affiliatesVirginia Commonwealth University Spine Center, Richmond, VA, USAen_US
dc.description.affiliatesUK HealthCare Pain Services, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USAen_US
dc.description.affiliatesDelaware Valley Pain & Spine Institute, Chalfront, PA, USAen_US
dc.description.affiliatesWestern Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, OH, USAen_US
dc.description.affiliatesHôpital de Zone Morges, Morges, Switzerlanden_US
dc.description.affiliatesBasildon and Thurrock University Hospitals FHT, Essex, UKen_US
dc.description.affiliatesHunter Pain Clinic, Newcastle, NSW, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesNeurovations Clinical Research, Napa, CA, USAen_US
dc.description.affiliatesDoleys Clinic, Birmingham, AL, USAen_US
dc.description.affiliatesCalifornia Pain Medicine Center, Los Angeles, CA, USAen_US
dc.description.affiliatesMossRehab, Elkins Park, PA, USAen_US
dc.description.affiliatesThe Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USAen_US
dc.description.affiliatesBryn Mawr Hospital, Bryn Mawr, PA, USAen_US
dc.description.affiliatesChristiana Hospital, Newark, DE, USAen_US
dc.description.affiliatesVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USAen_US
dc.description.affiliatesPacific Pain Treatment Center (ret.), San Francisco, CA, USAen_US
dc.description.affiliatesCleveland Clinic, Evidence-Based Pain Management Research, Cleveland, OH, USAen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28042906/en_US
dc.type.studyortrialReviewsen_US
dc.type.specialtyPain Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.fulltextlinkhttps://www.neuromodulationjournal.org/article/S1094-7159(21)03371-7/en_US
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PACC - Recommendations for Trialing of Intrathecal Drug Delivery Infusion Therapy.pdf
  Restricted Access
430.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

52
checked on Aug 30, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on Aug 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.