AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11055/1079
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorMacpherson, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorThakerar, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlexander, Men_US
dc.date2020-11-08-
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-27T05:55:02Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-27T05:55:02Z-
dc.identifier.issn1526-2375en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11055/1079-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Colorectal cancer surgery is commonly performed with adequate analgesia essential for patient recovery. This study assessed the effectiveness of intrathecal morphine and patient-controlled analgesia (ITM + PCA) vs patient-controlled analgesia alone (PCA) for postoperative pain management in colorectal cancer surgery. Methods: This retrospective study extracted and analyzed data covering a 4-year period (2014-2018) from a clinical database with 24- and 48-hour postsurgery follow-up. Primary outcomes included pain scores, median opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalence dose), sedation, nausea and vomiting, and length of admission. Outcomes were analyzed for ITM + PCA vs PCA alone, overall and stratified by laparotomy or laparoscopy procedures. Results: In total, 283 patients were included: ITM + PCA (163) and PCA alone (120). Median opioid consumption in the first 24 hours for ITM + PCA vs PCA alone was lower for laparotomy (-32.7 mg, P<0.001) and laparoscopy (-14.3 mg, P<0.001). Median pain score (worst pain) within the first 24 hours for ITM + PCA vs PCA alone was similar for laparotomy (P>0.05) and lower for laparoscopy (-1 unit, P=0.031). Sedation occurred less frequently for ITM + PCA vs PCA at 24 hours (3.5% vs 11.4%, P=0.031), with nonsignificant reduction at 48 hours (4.8% vs 18.8%, P=0.090) for laparotomy, but with no difference for laparoscopy (P>0.05). Incidence of nausea and vomiting and length of admission were similar for ITM + PCA vs PCA alone for laparotomy or laparoscopy (P>0.05). Conclusion: This retrospective study demonstrated that ITM + PCA can achieve similar analgesic effects after laparotomy and laparoscopy colorectal cancer surgery compared with PCA alone while resulting in a reduction of oral opioid consumption and lower incidence of sedation. Keywords: Colorectal; Intrathecal; Morphine; Oncology; Pain; Surgery.en_US
dc.subjectMorphineen_US
dc.subjectPainen_US
dc.subjectMedical oncologyen_US
dc.subjectRetrospective studiesen_US
dc.subjectPost-operative analgesiaen_US
dc.titleIntrathecal Morphine in Postoperative Analgesia for Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Studyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.journaltitlePain Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7142-8288en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5782-7912en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/pm/pnaa319en_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesCentre for Integrated Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesPharmacy Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.description.affiliatesDepartment of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australiaen_US
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33164104/en_US
dc.type.studyortrialStudyen_US
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

276
checked on Apr 26, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.