Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11055/1079
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Young, J | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Macpherson, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Thakerar, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Alexander, M | en_US |
dc.date | 2020-11-08 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-27T05:55:02Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-27T05:55:02Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1526-2375 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11055/1079 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Colorectal cancer surgery is commonly performed with adequate analgesia essential for patient recovery. This study assessed the effectiveness of intrathecal morphine and patient-controlled analgesia (ITM + PCA) vs patient-controlled analgesia alone (PCA) for postoperative pain management in colorectal cancer surgery. Methods: This retrospective study extracted and analyzed data covering a 4-year period (2014-2018) from a clinical database with 24- and 48-hour postsurgery follow-up. Primary outcomes included pain scores, median opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalence dose), sedation, nausea and vomiting, and length of admission. Outcomes were analyzed for ITM + PCA vs PCA alone, overall and stratified by laparotomy or laparoscopy procedures. Results: In total, 283 patients were included: ITM + PCA (163) and PCA alone (120). Median opioid consumption in the first 24 hours for ITM + PCA vs PCA alone was lower for laparotomy (-32.7 mg, P<0.001) and laparoscopy (-14.3 mg, P<0.001). Median pain score (worst pain) within the first 24 hours for ITM + PCA vs PCA alone was similar for laparotomy (P>0.05) and lower for laparoscopy (-1 unit, P=0.031). Sedation occurred less frequently for ITM + PCA vs PCA at 24 hours (3.5% vs 11.4%, P=0.031), with nonsignificant reduction at 48 hours (4.8% vs 18.8%, P=0.090) for laparotomy, but with no difference for laparoscopy (P>0.05). Incidence of nausea and vomiting and length of admission were similar for ITM + PCA vs PCA alone for laparotomy or laparoscopy (P>0.05). Conclusion: This retrospective study demonstrated that ITM + PCA can achieve similar analgesic effects after laparotomy and laparoscopy colorectal cancer surgery compared with PCA alone while resulting in a reduction of oral opioid consumption and lower incidence of sedation. Keywords: Colorectal; Intrathecal; Morphine; Oncology; Pain; Surgery. | en_US |
dc.subject | Morphine | en_US |
dc.subject | Pain | en_US |
dc.subject | Medical oncology | en_US |
dc.subject | Retrospective studies | en_US |
dc.subject | Post-operative analgesia | en_US |
dc.title | Intrathecal Morphine in Postoperative Analgesia for Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
dc.type.content | Text | en_US |
dc.identifier.journaltitle | Pain Medicine | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-7142-8288 | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-5782-7912 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/pm/pnaa319 | en_US |
dc.description.affiliates | Department of Anaesthesia and Pain, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia | en_US |
dc.description.affiliates | Centre for Integrated Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia | en_US |
dc.description.affiliates | Pharmacy Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia | en_US |
dc.description.affiliates | Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia | en_US |
dc.description.pubmeduri | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33164104/ | en_US |
dc.type.studyortrial | Study | en_US |
item.openairetype | Journal Article | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
Appears in Collections: | Scholarly and Clinical |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.