AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: The adaptation of pain assessment tools from high-income to low- and middle-income countries: psychometric properties of a set of chronic pain questionnaires in Mongolian and New Zealand patient samples
Authors: Tuck, NL
Khuvtsagaan, B
Rashid, U
Aamir, T
Goucke, R
Regjii, B
Dorjbal, EA
Lundeg, G
Bean, DJ
Keywords: Chronic Pain
Developing Countries
Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Pain Outcomes
New Zealand
Abstract: Objective: Chronic pain is a leading cause of disability in low- and middle-income countries; however, pain assessment tools have generally been developed and validated in high-income countries. This study examines the psychometric properties of a set of translated pain (and distress) questionnaires in Mongolia and documents the characteristics of people seeking treatment for chronic pain in Mongolia, compared with those in New Zealand, which is representative of high-income countries. Design: Cross-sectional, observational. Setting: Hospital-based pain treatment centers in New Zealand and Mongolia. Subjects: People seeking treatment for chronic pain in Mongolia (N = 142) and New Zealand (N = 159). Methods: The Brief Pain Inventory, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire were translated into Mongolian and administered to patients attending a hospital-based pain service. Questionnaires that were completed by patients in New Zealand were used for comparisons. Internal reliability, convergent validity, and factor structure were assessed in both groups. Results: Patients in Mongolia were older and reported lower pain intensity, interference, and distress and higher pain self-efficacy than those in New Zealand. The translated questionnaires had good internal consistencies, and the relationships between pain variables were similar across both groups. The factor structure for the Pain Catastrophizing Scale was consistent across both groups, but this was not the case for the Brief Pain Inventory or the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21. Conclusions: Findings indicate that some pain outcome measures may be appropriate for use in Mongolia and should be investigated in other low- and middle-income countries.
DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa267
PubMed URL:
ISSN: 1526-2375
Journal Title: Pain Medicine
Type: Journal Article
Affiliates: The Auckland Regional Pain Service
The Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology
The Waitematā District Health Board (WDHB) Chronic Pain Service, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
Anesthesiology Department, First Central Hospital, Ulaanbatar, Mongolia
University of Western Australia
The Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences
Study/Trial: Observational study
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.