Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11055/872
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chuan Alwin | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lim Yean Chin | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Aneja Harmeet | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Duce Nicholas | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Appleyard Richard | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Forrest Kirsty | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Royse Colin F | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-21T01:25:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-21T01:25:59Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11055/872 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this prospective, blinded, randomised controlled study was to compare novices’ acquisition of the technical skills of ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia using either a meat phantom model or fresh-frozen human cadavers. The primary outcome was the time taken to successfully perform an ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block on a cadaver; secondary outcomes were the cumulative score of errors, and best image quality of the sciatic nerve achieved. After training, the median (IQR [range]) time taken to perform the block was 311(164–390 [68–600]) s in the meat model trained group and 210 (174–354 [85–600]) s in the fresh-frozen cadaver trained group (p = 0.24). Participants made a median (IQR [range]) of 18 (14–33 [8–55]) and 15 (12–22 [8–44]) errors in the two groups respectively (p = 0.39). The image quality score was also not different, with a median (IQR [range]) of 62.5 (59.4– 65.6 [25.0–100.0])% vs 62.5 (62.5–75.0 [25.0–87.5])% respectively (p = 0.58). The training and deliberate feedback improved all participants’ block performance, the median (IQR [range]) times being 310 (206–532 [110–600]) s before and 240 (174–354 [85–600]) s after training (p = 0.02). We conclude that novices taught ultrasound scanning and needle guidance skills using an inexpensive and easily constructed meat model perform similarly to those trained on a cadaveric model. | en_US |
dc.subject | regional Anaesthesia | en_US |
dc.subject | Medical Education | en_US |
dc.subject | ultrasound-guided regional Anaesthesia | en_US |
dc.subject | training | en_US |
dc.title | A randomised controlled trial comparing meat-based with human cadaveric models for teaching ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
dc.type.content | Text | en_US |
dc.identifier.journaltitle | Anaesthesia | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-4356-6525 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/anae.13446 | en_US |
dc.description.affiliates | University of New South Wales, Sydney | en_US |
dc.description.pubmeduri | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26993374 | en_US |
dc.type.studyortrial | Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial/Controlled Clinical Trial | en_US |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | restricted | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairetype | Journal Article | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
Appears in Collections: | Scholarly and Clinical |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
10.1111_anae.13446.pdf Restricted Access | 330.86 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.