AIRR - ANZCA Institutional Research Repository
Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11055/684
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, S-
dc.contributor.authorStewart, P A-
dc.contributor.authorFreelander, N-
dc.contributor.authorHeller, G-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-24T01:47:11Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-24T01:47:11Z-
dc.date.issued2012-07-
dc.identifier.citationAnaesthesia and intensive care 2012-07; 40(4): 690-6-
dc.identifier.issn0310-057X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11055/684-
dc.description.abstractThe evoked electromyographic responses to supramaximal train of four stimulation of three muscles, all innervated by the ulnar nerve, were compared during recovery from non-depolarising neuromuscular blockade. The abductor digiti minimi was the most resistant to neuromuscular blockade (P <0.001) and the most repeatable (repeatability coefficient 4.4%) when compared with the adductor pollicis (5.9%) and the first dorsal interosseous (5.8%). The abductor digiti minimi had a bias of 0.1 compared to the adductor pollicis and first dorsal interosseous and its limits of agreement were more acceptable (-0.10 to 0.30) at a train of four ratio of 0.9. The electromyography train of four of the adductor pollicis and first dorsal interosseous at 0.8 is equivalent to an electromyography train of four of 0.9 at abductor digiti minimi.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subject.meshAdolescent-
dc.subject.meshAdult-
dc.subject.meshAged-
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and over-
dc.subject.meshFemale-
dc.subject.meshHand-
dc.subject.meshHumans-
dc.subject.meshMale-
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.meshMuscle, Skeletal-
dc.subject.meshNeuromuscular Junction-
dc.subject.meshElectromyography-
dc.subject.meshNeuromuscular Blockade-
dc.titleComparison of evoked electromyography in three muscles of the hand during recovery from non-depolarising neuromuscular blockade.-
dc.typeComparative Study-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't-
dc.identifier.journaltitleAnaesthesia and intensive care-
dc.description.pubmedurihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22813498-
dc.identifier.pubmedid22813498-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeComparative Study-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairetypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Scholarly and Clinical
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

10
checked on May 8, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.